JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 1, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Natalia Bernal Cano

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos mínimos para la admisión
  • Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio luego de verificar que la demandante en el escrito de corrección, en lugar de subsanar las falencias identificadas previamente en el auto inadmisorio, replicó los planteamientos esbozados inicialmente.

La Sala Plena de la Corte compartió las apreciaciones vertidas en los autos de inadmisión y de rechazo, en cuanto al hecho de que los escritos presentados por la actora no lograron aportar los elementos para la configuración de la controversia jurídica, ni tampoco suministraron los insumos básicos del juicio de constitucionalidad.

Con base en lo anterior, se CONFIRMÓ el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del dia 3 de junio de 2020 expedido en el marco del expediente D-13700, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los articulos 90, 91 y 93 del Codigo Civil.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.